Archives

Title Posted
Does the Manticoran Peerage allow Proxy Voting Dec 2002
Why doesn't Elizabeth <em>pack</em> the Lords? Dec 2002
Administrative and tactical organization of the RMN Dec 2002
Fission/fusion power reactors Dec 2002
Counter-missile canisters Dec 2002
Counter-missile fire control issues and counter-missile pods Dec 2002
"Buckshot" missile defenses Jan 2003
Effectiveness of cruisers-vs-battlecruisers Feb 2003
<em>Wayfarer </em>and camouflaging itself as a merchantman Feb 2003
Gun control in the Star Kingdom of Manticore Feb 2003
8 of 24
  7 | 8 | 9  

Filters

Narrow the posts above by selecting a series or specifying a keyword.

Options

Pearls of Weber

A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.

Posted by David at 12:00am

Fleet strengths as of 1920 PD

  • Series: Honorverse
  • Date: December 17, 2004
  Star Kingdom of Manticore Protectorate of Grayson Andermani Empire Allied Total Republic of Haven
Ship Type in service in reserve total in service in reserve total in service in reserve total in service in reserve total in service in reserve total
SD(P) 75 0 75 115 0 115 42 0 42 232 0 232 318 0 318
SD 125 100 225 30 60 90 193 30 223 348 190 538 216 103 319
DN(P) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DN 6 0 6 0 0 0 18 70 88 24 70 94 47 0 47
CLAC (Fleet) 42 0 42 24 0 24 6 0 6 72 0 72 48 0 48
BC(P) 6 0 6 40 0 40 11 0 11 57 0 57 0 0 0
BC (Large) 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
BC 75 125 200 32 28 60 98 12 110 205 165 370 98 17 115
CA (Large) 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 80 40 120
CA 115 30 145 60 0 60 80 20 100 255 50 305 0 0 0
CL 217 60 277 40 0 40 80 20 100 337 80 417 110 30 140
DD 206 212 418 20 0 20 120 20 140 346 232 578 66 130 196
                               
TOTAL 871 527 1398 361 88 449 648 172 820 1,880 787 2,667 983 320 1,303

 

OK, Richard --

Here's the table I told you I'd send you. Please note that these are only ships actually in commission and in reserve; it says nothing about ships under construction. I have those numbers worked out in equal detail, but I'm not going to share them, even in Snerkers Only. As I told you on the phone, I want this posted in Snerkers, because I think it's pretty obvious that it's going to contain information that people who don't like snerks or snippets aren't going to want to have waved in front of them. I suppose it's inevitable that eventually, as seems to happen a bit too often, something that was originally intended solely for Snerkers is going to get out into one of the other conferences, not because anyone intentionally breaks the rules but because of sloppy quotes and snipping, so decided the best way to keep the damage to a minimum is to play my cards a little closer to the vest.