Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Why the Queen's Own exists | Apr 2009 |
| Operation Ark's mission plan | Apr 2009 |
| A comparative look at the BC(P) vs BC(L) | Apr 2009 |
| Where is the RMMC boot camp located? | Apr 2009 |
| Do you plan ahead for which characters die? | Apr 2009 |
| Elizabeth III is <em>not </em>an irrational nut-job | Apr 2009 |
| Freighting LACs to the Talbott Quadrant | Apr 2009 |
| Elizabeth's new royal yacht, HMS <em>Duke of Cromarty</em> | Apr 2009 |
| Hyper transits | Apr 2009 |
| Hyper translation | Apr 2009 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Compensator failure
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: October 31, 2004
On the compensator issue. No, it isn't possible to kill power to the wedge quickly enough to save the crew's lives in the event of compensator failure. And, no, compensator failures aren't "elastic" enough to permit any sort of controlled shut down or additional inertia dumping to save the crew, either.
The sump is a little elastic, which is how you can at least try to take a compensator beyond its rated top limit and maybe survive, as Honor did on her middy cruise. The odds of doing so are… poor.
I think I've said before that compensator failures are all or nothing. If I haven't also said specifically that they're effectively instantaneous events, I should have. The sump's limits can be strained and even theoretically exceeded -- briefly! -- without the compensator necessarily failing, but the instant it decides to shut down, it dies completely and catastrophically, and with absolutely no detectable warning signs. Either it's working perfectly, even if temporarily in excess of its designed maximum load, or the crew is anchovy paste. On or off. A binary solution.
