Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| <em>Roland</em>-class destroyer | Oct 2004 |
| Compensator failure | Oct 2004 |
| The status of the Lynx System | Oct 2004 |
| The Union of Monica | Oct 2004 |
| Why does Mesa still exist? | Oct 2004 |
| LACs towing counter-missile pods | Oct 2004 |
| Strategic map as of <em>Shadow of Saganami</em> | Sep 2004 |
| Variable geometry starships | Sep 2004 |
| Recon LACs | Sep 2004 |
| Powered missile pods | Sep 2004 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
How big is a recon drone?
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: August 23, 2004
Just how big is a drone? Or is that classified information? Obviously, the size of the drone (assuming that the CMs proposed above would have to be drone-sized) is going to affect how reasonable it would be to think in terms of deploying them through missile tubes.
To give you an idea, the standard Manticoran counter-missile as of War of Honor, masses about 12.5 tons. Havenite counter-missiles are about 25% larger, and individually less capable despite their greater size. A single-drive capital ship missile runs to about 135 tons, or better than ten times the size of a single counter-missile. The remote platforms being deployed by the RMN these days, which would approximate the minimum size capable of squeezing in the proposed drive arrangement, are over twice the size of an old-style capital missile, which is why they are deployed by swimming them out of boat bays rather than firing them through tubes. So, let's assume that you could build one of these things for "only" 270 tons. In that case, each of them would replace something like 22 standard counter-missiles. Not a good trade in the opinion of the missile defense officers.
