Title | Posted |
---|---|
Why the Queen's Own exists | Apr 2009 |
Operation Ark's mission plan | Apr 2009 |
A comparative look at the BC(P) vs BC(L) | Apr 2009 |
Where is the RMMC boot camp located? | Apr 2009 |
Do you plan ahead for which characters die? | Apr 2009 |
Elizabeth III is <em>not </em>an irrational nut-job | Apr 2009 |
Freighting LACs to the Talbott Quadrant | Apr 2009 |
Elizabeth's new royal yacht, HMS <em>Duke of Cromarty</em> | Apr 2009 |
Hyper transits | Apr 2009 |
Hyper translation | Apr 2009 |
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Just how big is a drone? Or is that classified information? Obviously, the size of the drone (assuming that the CMs proposed above would have to be drone-sized) is going to affect how reasonable it would be to think in terms of deploying them through missile tubes.
To give you an idea, the standard Manticoran counter-missile as of War of Honor, masses about 12.5 tons. Havenite counter-missiles are about 25% larger, and individually less capable despite their greater size. A single-drive capital ship missile runs to about 135 tons, or better than ten times the size of a single counter-missile. The remote platforms being deployed by the RMN these days, which would approximate the minimum size capable of squeezing in the proposed drive arrangement, are over twice the size of an old-style capital missile, which is why they are deployed by swimming them out of boat bays rather than firing them through tubes. So, let's assume that you could build one of these things for "only" 270 tons. In that case, each of them would replace something like 22 standard counter-missiles. Not a good trade in the opinion of the missile defense officers.