Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Reinforcements for the Battle of Manticore | Dec 2005 |
| FTL fire control communication lag | May 2006 |
| Stability of the Republic of Haven and system secession | Jul 2006 |
| Misconceptions about the League | Aug 2006 |
| Relationships between universes | Sep 2006 |
| Survival of the Church of Humanity Unchained | Sep 2006 |
| The nature of the hradani and the Rage | Oct 2006 |
| Coursers and the Fall of Kontovar | Oct 2006 |
| Keyhole platform survivability | Nov 2006 |
| <em>Nike </em>(big BC) clarification | Nov 2006 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Hardening shipkiller missile drives
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: June 10, 2005
A suggestion has been made that it would make sense to put drives into shipkiller missiles of sufficient power to make them immune to wedge kill by a counter-missile. Is this practical? Could it be done as the final stage of a MDM?
No, it isn't. And it won't be -- ever. I believe we've had this discussion before. You cannot -- not "it would be hard," not "only possible with great difficulty," but cannot -- build a missile drive sufficiently powerful to take out another missile (or counter-missile) drive without being taken out itself. End of story. The physical size constraints make it impossible. That's why counter-missiles have used their impeller wedges as their primary missile-killing weapon for so long.
