Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Operation Ark's mission plan | Apr 2009 |
| A comparative look at the BC(P) vs BC(L) | Apr 2009 |
| Where is the RMMC boot camp located? | Apr 2009 |
| Do you plan ahead for which characters die? | Apr 2009 |
| Elizabeth III is <em>not </em>an irrational nut-job | Apr 2009 |
| Order of Battle: Third Clash - The Great Visit Reserve | Apr 2009 |
| Wealth and opportunities in the Solarian League | Apr 2009 |
| More on the Keyhole platforms | Mar 2009 |
| How much has the Maya Sector's military capability improved? | Mar 2009 |
| The Mesan Spider Drive | Mar 2009 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Hardening shipkiller missile drives
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: June 10, 2005
A suggestion has been made that it would make sense to put drives into shipkiller missiles of sufficient power to make them immune to wedge kill by a counter-missile. Is this practical? Could it be done as the final stage of a MDM?
No, it isn't. And it won't be -- ever. I believe we've had this discussion before. You cannot -- not "it would be hard," not "only possible with great difficulty," but cannot -- build a missile drive sufficiently powerful to take out another missile (or counter-missile) drive without being taken out itself. End of story. The physical size constraints make it impossible. That's why counter-missiles have used their impeller wedges as their primary missile-killing weapon for so long.
