Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| PICAs and military manpower needs | Feb 2008 |
| Climax to the Battle of Manticore | Jan 2008 |
| Baron High Ridge's fate | Dec 2007 |
| <em>Saganami-C</em> vs a pre-war superdreadnought | Dec 2007 |
| Safeholdian ship design | Mar 2007 |
| Pre-war alliance strategy | Feb 2007 |
| Deep-penetration & commerce raiding strategy | Feb 2007 |
| Deep-penetration strategy | Feb 2007 |
| Strategic attrition | Feb 2007 |
| <em>Nike </em>(big BC) clarification | Nov 2006 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Hardening shipkiller missile drives
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: June 10, 2005
A suggestion has been made that it would make sense to put drives into shipkiller missiles of sufficient power to make them immune to wedge kill by a counter-missile. Is this practical? Could it be done as the final stage of a MDM?
No, it isn't. And it won't be -- ever. I believe we've had this discussion before. You cannot -- not "it would be hard," not "only possible with great difficulty," but cannot -- build a missile drive sufficiently powerful to take out another missile (or counter-missile) drive without being taken out itself. End of story. The physical size constraints make it impossible. That's why counter-missiles have used their impeller wedges as their primary missile-killing weapon for so long.
