Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Artificial divisions within the SLN | Mar 2004 |
| The Battle of Farley's Crossing | Mar 2004 |
| <em>Gauntlet</em>'s weapons fit | Mar 2004 |
| Erewhon and the inertial compensator | Apr 2004 |
| Battleship and SD(P) comparisons | Apr 2004 |
| System control ships | Apr 2004 |
| Grav pulse comm post <em>Ashes of Victory</em> | Apr 2004 |
| Artificial intelligence and nanotechnology | Apr 2004 |
| Shipyard types | Jun 2004 |
| <em>Medusa-Bs</em> | Jun 2004 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Hardening shipkiller missile drives
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: June 10, 2005
A suggestion has been made that it would make sense to put drives into shipkiller missiles of sufficient power to make them immune to wedge kill by a counter-missile. Is this practical? Could it be done as the final stage of a MDM?
No, it isn't. And it won't be -- ever. I believe we've had this discussion before. You cannot -- not "it would be hard," not "only possible with great difficulty," but cannot -- build a missile drive sufficiently powerful to take out another missile (or counter-missile) drive without being taken out itself. End of story. The physical size constraints make it impossible. That's why counter-missiles have used their impeller wedges as their primary missile-killing weapon for so long.
