Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Warshaski sail missiles | Oct 2002 |
| <em>Wayfarer</em>'s cargo doors | Oct 2002 |
| "Weaknesses" of the SD(P) classes | Oct 2002 |
| Wedge geometry | Oct 2002 |
| The Grendelsbane yards vulnerability | Oct 2002 |
| Source of the Grayson starship reserves | Oct 2002 |
| System defense ships | Oct 2002 |
| Ground warfare | Oct 2002 |
| Hyperspace near a Wormhole Junction | Oct 2002 |
| Kinetic infrastructure attacks | Oct 2002 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Hardening shipkiller missile drives
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: June 10, 2005
A suggestion has been made that it would make sense to put drives into shipkiller missiles of sufficient power to make them immune to wedge kill by a counter-missile. Is this practical? Could it be done as the final stage of a MDM?
No, it isn't. And it won't be -- ever. I believe we've had this discussion before. You cannot -- not "it would be hard," not "only possible with great difficulty," but cannot -- build a missile drive sufficiently powerful to take out another missile (or counter-missile) drive without being taken out itself. End of story. The physical size constraints make it impossible. That's why counter-missiles have used their impeller wedges as their primary missile-killing weapon for so long.
