Title | Posted |
---|---|
Congo-Maya-Erewhon map | Sep 2004 |
Colin's mistake | Sep 2004 |
Firing hyper missiles within the hyper threshold | Sep 2004 |
LACs as kamikazis | Sep 2004 |
Hyper-band access by ship type | Sep 2004 |
Peep intelligence gathering | Aug 2004 |
Andermani intelligence gathering | Aug 2004 |
Treecat toenails | Aug 2004 |
Admiral Hemphil and <em>Fearless'</em> deployment | Aug 2004 |
Energy torpedos in a defensive role | Aug 2004 |
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Is anyone going to build a single-drive missile with a fusion power plant?
Almost certainly not. A fusion plant is larger than the capacitors required to store the energy required by a single-drive missile. It's smaller than the multiple capacitors required to power the multiple drive systems of an MDM. In addition, adding the necessary hardware to kickstart the fusion plant before launch would require a substantial up-sizing of the launchers firing them. The only real argument in favor of putting a fusion plant aboard a single-drive missile would be that it would provide both the power density and the endurance required to take full advantage of the EW capabilities provided by Ghost Rider. That isn't a minor consideration, but for a ship which would be firing single-drive missiles, that's not likely to be as significant a concern. Those vessels are going to be smaller and less capable, whatever they do. If the idea is that somehow switching to a fusion-plant drive and single-drive missile would produce a smaller single-drive weapon, that wouldn't happen.