Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Unmanned LACs | Aug 2004 |
| Honor's Second Marsh strategy | Aug 2004 |
| c-Fractional missile attack plan | Aug 2004 |
| Energy-siphon effect | Aug 2004 |
| How big is a recon drone? | Aug 2004 |
| Wedge interaction | Aug 2004 |
| Counter-missile pods and two-stage counter-missiles | Aug 2004 |
| Wedge-killer missiles | Aug 2004 |
| Masada and the Eridani Edict | Jul 2004 |
| <em>Medusa-Bs</em> | Jun 2004 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Using debris as a 'warp point denial system'
- Series: Starfire With Steve White
- Date: October 22, 2002
The problem is you can't do it at all, except on a closed warp point. The instant you dump the material into the space which would be occupied by an emerging starship, it goes through to the other side, where it simply becomes a debris cloud the ships pass through on their way into the warp point. The drive fields will give them plenty enough protection against that sort of normal-space impact on their way in.
Mines are not in the materialization area of the warp point; they are on the periphery, which is as close as they can get without literally making transit (whether they want to or not). To put the material into an area which would present a danger to emerging starships would require dumping it into the transit zone, which is one reason no starship has ever been lost to interpenetration with naturally occurring space junk making transit through an open warp point; the stuff simply can't stay even momentarily in a place where it would pose any danger to emerging ships.
