Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Operation Ark's mission plan | Apr 2009 |
| A comparative look at the BC(P) vs BC(L) | Apr 2009 |
| Where is the RMMC boot camp located? | Apr 2009 |
| Do you plan ahead for which characters die? | Apr 2009 |
| Elizabeth III is <em>not </em>an irrational nut-job | Apr 2009 |
| Order of Battle: Third Clash - The Great Visit Reserve | Apr 2009 |
| Wealth and opportunities in the Solarian League | Apr 2009 |
| More on the Keyhole platforms | Mar 2009 |
| How much has the Maya Sector's military capability improved? | Mar 2009 |
| The Mesan Spider Drive | Mar 2009 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Using debris as a 'warp point denial system'
- Series: Starfire With Steve White
- Date: October 22, 2002
The problem is you can't do it at all, except on a closed warp point. The instant you dump the material into the space which would be occupied by an emerging starship, it goes through to the other side, where it simply becomes a debris cloud the ships pass through on their way into the warp point. The drive fields will give them plenty enough protection against that sort of normal-space impact on their way in.
Mines are not in the materialization area of the warp point; they are on the periphery, which is as close as they can get without literally making transit (whether they want to or not). To put the material into an area which would present a danger to emerging starships would require dumping it into the transit zone, which is one reason no starship has ever been lost to interpenetration with naturally occurring space junk making transit through an open warp point; the stuff simply can't stay even momentarily in a place where it would pose any danger to emerging ships.
