Title | Posted |
---|---|
Variable geometry starships | Sep 2004 |
Recon LACs | Sep 2004 |
Strategic map as of <em>Shadow of Saganami</em> | Sep 2004 |
LACs towing counter-missile pods | Oct 2004 |
Why does Mesa still exist? | Oct 2004 |
The status of the Lynx System | Oct 2004 |
The Union of Monica | Oct 2004 |
<em>Roland</em>-class destroyer | Oct 2004 |
Compensator failure | Oct 2004 |
"Paintball"-style projectile weapons training | Nov 2004 |
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Most of the other issues you've raised vis-à-vis the Mesan pods are answered by two basic considerations. First, my comments about cee-fractional strikes were predicated on the [way?] the people wanted these things to come looking in at 80 or 90% of light-speed. The Mesan ships are down to only 20% of light-speed when they deploy their pods, which means that they're coming in at only somewhere around 60,000 KPS instead of 270,000 KPS. Moreover, they were specifically designed for this specific operation. You can think of it as the equivalent of the Japanese adapting their torpedoes for the Pearl Harbor attack so that they didn't drive as deep and bury themselves in the harbor mud when they were dropped. Each pod is equipped with specially designed ablative shielding which obviously wouldn't stand up to the erosion of weeks and weeks of .9 cee travel but is tough enough to survive this attack profile, especially since they're going to be given their long-range targeting information from pre-deployed sensor platforms. In other words, what needs to be protected is their relatively short-range sensors, not what they'd be using to [acquire] targets at long range for themselves.